Difference between revisions of "Philthy Writing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Writing Frames: 20-Mark Questions== | ==Writing Frames: 20-Mark Questions== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Introduction=== | ||
+ | *DAD: | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question. | ||
+ | **"A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response. | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Evaluative Paragraphs=== | ||
+ | *PARCEL: | ||
+ | **"P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to be discussed in the paragraph. | ||
+ | **"A" stands for "authority/advocate" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice or scripture. | ||
+ | **"R" stands for "reasoning" - explain the reasons why some might consider the point to be a strong argument. | ||
+ | **"C" stands for "counter" - explain the reasons why another person might question the point and its reasoning. | ||
+ | **"E" stands for "evaluate" - identify which side’s arguments has the greater value and why. | ||
+ | **"L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Conclusion=== | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is. | ||
+ | **"R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion; relate back to the judgements reached along the way in the evaluative paragraphs. | ||
+ | **"S" stands for "strengths" - explain why your point of view and reasoning is the more persuasive. | ||
==Evaluative Criteria== | ==Evaluative Criteria== |
Revision as of 10:36, 26 February 2020
The purpose of this page is to assist you in writing like a Philosopher or Theologian would.
Contents
Writing Frames: 20-Mark Questions
Introduction
- DAD:
- "D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question.
- "A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response.
- "D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support.
Analytical Paragraphs
- PEEL:
- "P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to discussed in the paragraph.
- "E" stands for "evidence" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice, or scripture
- "E" stands for "explanation" - outline the details.
- "L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question.
Conclusion
- DR:
- "D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is.
- "R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion.
Writing Frames: 20-Mark Questions
Introduction
- DAD:
- "D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question.
- "A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response.
- "D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support.
Evaluative Paragraphs
- PARCEL:
- "P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to be discussed in the paragraph.
- "A" stands for "authority/advocate" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice or scripture.
- "R" stands for "reasoning" - explain the reasons why some might consider the point to be a strong argument.
- "C" stands for "counter" - explain the reasons why another person might question the point and its reasoning.
- "E" stands for "evaluate" - identify which side’s arguments has the greater value and why.
- "L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question.
Conclusion
- "D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is.
- "R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion; relate back to the judgements reached along the way in the evaluative paragraphs.
- "S" stands for "strengths" - explain why your point of view and reasoning is the more persuasive.
Evaluative Criteria
Questions to Consider
The criteria below are designed to assist you in judging whether a particular argument is strong or weak. You should refer to these in a 30-mark question.
- Is the focus on ideas rather than the person that supports them?
- Is it influential / impactful on the lives of others?
- Is it relevant to the debate?
- Does it fit with other beliefs?
- Is there a sufficient range of evidence to support it?
- Can it be contradicted easily?
- Can it be achieved?
- Is it supported by sources of authority?
- Is there any evidence to support it?
- Is it probable, possible, or likely?
- Is it popular?
- How representative are its supporters?
- Has other evidence been ignored?
- Is it logical?
- Is the view being attacked misrepresented?