Difference between revisions of "Write Like A Political Scientist"
		
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Useful Conjunctions==  | ==Useful Conjunctions==  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Punctuation==  | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 11 December 2018
Writing Frames
- 30-Mark Source Questions (Paper 1 - Question 1a or 1b / Paper 2 - Question 1a or 1b):
 
- 30-Mark Essay Questions (Paper 1 - Question 2a or 2b / Paper 2 - Question 2a or 2b / Paper 3 - Question 3a or 3b or 3c):
 
- 24-Mark Political Ideas Questions (Paper 1 - Question 3a or 3b / Paper 2 - Question 3a or 3b):
 
- 12-Mark Comparative Questions (Paper 3 - Question 1a or 1b):
 
- 12-Mark Comparative Theory Questions (Paper 3 - Question 2):
 
Evaluative Phrases
- “This is a strong argument because...”
 - “This is a weak argument because…”
 - “This claim can be effectively countered by…”
 - “This claim can be countered, but rather poorly, by…”
 - “This point stands up to scrutiny as…”
 - “This point fails to stand up to scrutiny as…”
 - “The underlying assumption behind this reason is a convincing one…”
 - “The underlying assumption behind this reason is doubtful…”
 - “The two assertions are equally balanced…”
 - “It is difficult to choose between the evidence here…”