Difference between revisions of "Write Like A Political Scientist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Writing Frames== ==Evaluative Phrases== ==Useful Conjunctions==") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Evaluative Phrases== | ==Evaluative Phrases== | ||
| + | *“This is a strong argument because...” | ||
| + | *“This is a weak argument because…” | ||
| + | *“This claim can be effectively countered by…” | ||
| + | *“This claim can be countered, but rather poorly, by…” | ||
| + | *“This point stands up to scrutiny as…” | ||
| + | *“This point fails to stand up to scrutiny as…” | ||
| + | *“The underlying assumption behind this reason is a convincing one…” | ||
| + | *“The underlying assumption behind this reason is doubtful…” | ||
| + | *“The two assertions are equally balanced…” | ||
| + | *“It is difficult to choose between the evidence here…” | ||
==Useful Conjunctions== | ==Useful Conjunctions== | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 11 December 2018
Writing Frames
Evaluative Phrases
- “This is a strong argument because...”
- “This is a weak argument because…”
- “This claim can be effectively countered by…”
- “This claim can be countered, but rather poorly, by…”
- “This point stands up to scrutiny as…”
- “This point fails to stand up to scrutiny as…”
- “The underlying assumption behind this reason is a convincing one…”
- “The underlying assumption behind this reason is doubtful…”
- “The two assertions are equally balanced…”
- “It is difficult to choose between the evidence here…”
