Difference between revisions of "Philthy Writing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The purpose of this page is to assist you in writing like a Philosopher or Theologian would.") |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The purpose of this page is to assist you in writing like a Philosopher or Theologian would. | The purpose of this page is to assist you in writing like a Philosopher or Theologian would. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Writing Frames: 20-Mark Questions== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Introduction=== | ||
+ | *DAD: | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question. | ||
+ | **"A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response. | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Analytical Paragraphs=== | ||
+ | *PEEL: | ||
+ | **"P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to discussed in the paragraph. | ||
+ | **"E" stands for "evidence" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice, or scripture | ||
+ | **"E" stands for "explanation" - outline the details. | ||
+ | **"L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Conclusion=== | ||
+ | *DR: | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is. | ||
+ | **"R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Writing Frames: 30-Mark Questions== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Introduction=== | ||
+ | *DAD: | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question. | ||
+ | **"A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response. | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Evaluative Paragraphs=== | ||
+ | *PARCEL: | ||
+ | **"P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to be discussed in the paragraph. | ||
+ | **"A" stands for "authority/advocate" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice or scripture. | ||
+ | **"R" stands for "reasoning" - explain the reasons why some might consider the point to be a strong argument. | ||
+ | **"C" stands for "counter" - explain the reasons why another person might question the point and its reasoning. | ||
+ | **"E" stands for "evaluate" - identify which side’s arguments has the greater value and why. | ||
+ | **"L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Conclusion=== | ||
+ | **"D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is. | ||
+ | **"R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion; relate back to the judgements reached along the way in the evaluative paragraphs. | ||
+ | **"S" stands for "strengths" - explain why your point of view and reasoning is the more persuasive. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Evaluative Criteria== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Questions to Consider=== | ||
+ | ''The criteria below are designed to assist you in judging whether a particular argument is strong or weak. You should refer to these in a 30-mark question.'' | ||
+ | *Is the focus on ideas rather than the person that supports them? | ||
+ | *Is it influential / impactful on the lives of others? | ||
+ | *Is it relevant to the debate? | ||
+ | *Does it fit with other beliefs? | ||
+ | *Is there a sufficient range of evidence to support it? | ||
+ | *Can it be contradicted easily? | ||
+ | *Can it be achieved? | ||
+ | *Is it supported by sources of authority? | ||
+ | *Is there any evidence to support it? | ||
+ | *Is it probable, possible, or likely? | ||
+ | *Is it popular? | ||
+ | *How representative are its supporters? | ||
+ | *Has other evidence been ignored? | ||
+ | *Is it logical? | ||
+ | *Is the view being attacked misrepresented? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Evaluative Phrases== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Sentence Starters=== | ||
+ | ''Use the following to signal to the examiner that you are meeting the expectations of Assessment Objective 2.'' | ||
+ | *“This is a strong argument because...” | ||
+ | *“This is a weak argument because…” | ||
+ | *“This claim can be effectively countered by…” | ||
+ | *“This claim can be countered, but rather poorly, by…” | ||
+ | *“This point stands up to scrutiny as…” | ||
+ | *“This point fails to stand up to scrutiny as…” | ||
+ | *“The underlying assumption behind this reason is a convincing one…” | ||
+ | *“The underlying assumption behind this reason is doubtful…” | ||
+ | *“The two assertions are equally balanced…” | ||
+ | *“It is difficult to choose between the evidence here…” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Useful Conjunctions== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Addition=== | ||
+ | *Again; also; and; another; as well as; furthermore; in addition; moreover; too; what is more. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cause & Effect=== | ||
+ | *As a consequence; as a result; as long as; because; consequently; depending upon; inevitably; since; therefore; whenever. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Comparison=== | ||
+ | *By the same token; comparatively; congruently; correspondingly; equally; equivalently; in the same way; just as; likewise; similarly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Concession=== | ||
+ | *Admittedly; despite this; in any case; in spite of; nevertheless; notwithstanding; on the other hand; regardless; still; while it is true that. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Contrast=== | ||
+ | *Alternatively; although; despite this; however; in contrast; on the contrary; on the other hand; otherwise; whereas; yet. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Emphasis=== | ||
+ | *Above all; especially; in fact; in particular; indeed; more important(ly); notably; significantly; specifically; undoubtedly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Illustration=== | ||
+ | *Essentially; for example; for instance; in actual fact; it became clear that; such as; this means that; this shows that; thus; to illustrate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Summary & Conclusion=== | ||
+ | *After all; finally; in conclusion; in short; in the end; on the whole; overall; throughout; to summarise; ultimately. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Punctuation== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Colon=== | ||
+ | *Appearance: ":" | ||
+ | *Use: a colon is used to list, join two clauses when the second cannot stand alone, and before a quotation or direct speech. | ||
+ | *Examples: | ||
+ | **You will need: a calculator, ruler and pen. | ||
+ | **I knew what to do: admit I had no book. | ||
+ | **Sir said: “Mark is a very able statistician.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Semi-Colon=== | ||
+ | *Appearance: ";" | ||
+ | *Use: a semi-colon is used in between two equal clauses, which are closely related but could stand alone. | ||
+ | *Examples: | ||
+ | **Lizzie went to town; I stayed at home. | ||
+ | **Terry hates spiders; he finds them creepy. | ||
+ | **I love dogs; however, I dislike their smell. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Key Terms== | ||
+ | *[https://sixthform.bourne-grammar.lincs.sch.uk/images/a/a4/GFT.pdf Go to: Eduqas A Level Religious Studies Guidance for Teaching.] | ||
+ | *Key terms for Component 1 - the Study of Religion (Option D: Buddhism): see pp.80-87. | ||
+ | *Key terms for Component 2 - the Philosophy of Religion: see pp.132-141. | ||
+ | *Key terms for Component 3 - Religion and Ethics: see pp.158-167. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Return to "Religious Studies"== | ||
+ | *[[Religious Studies|Religious Studies]] |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 27 February 2020
The purpose of this page is to assist you in writing like a Philosopher or Theologian would.
Contents
Writing Frames: 20-Mark Questions
Introduction
- DAD:
- "D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question.
- "A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response.
- "D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support.
Analytical Paragraphs
- PEEL:
- "P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to discussed in the paragraph.
- "E" stands for "evidence" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice, or scripture
- "E" stands for "explanation" - outline the details.
- "L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question.
Conclusion
- DR:
- "D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is.
- "R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion.
Writing Frames: 30-Mark Questions
Introduction
- DAD:
- "D" stands for "define" - detail the meaning of the key terms in the question.
- "A" stands for "abstract" - summarise the main points you will explore in your response.
- "D" stands for "destination" - preview which side of the debate you are likely to support.
Evaluative Paragraphs
- PARCEL:
- "P" stands for "point" - introduce the point that is to be discussed in the paragraph.
- "A" stands for "authority/advocate" - quote an ethicist, philosopher of religion/theologian, or scholar of Buddhism/Buddhist belief, practice or scripture.
- "R" stands for "reasoning" - explain the reasons why some might consider the point to be a strong argument.
- "C" stands for "counter" - explain the reasons why another person might question the point and its reasoning.
- "E" stands for "evaluate" - identify which side’s arguments has the greater value and why.
- "L" stands for "link" - relate the discussion above back to the question.
Conclusion
- "D" stands for "destination" - state what your conclusion is.
- "R" stands for "reasoning" - give the main reasons that justify your conclusion; relate back to the judgements reached along the way in the evaluative paragraphs.
- "S" stands for "strengths" - explain why your point of view and reasoning is the more persuasive.
Evaluative Criteria
Questions to Consider
The criteria below are designed to assist you in judging whether a particular argument is strong or weak. You should refer to these in a 30-mark question.
- Is the focus on ideas rather than the person that supports them?
- Is it influential / impactful on the lives of others?
- Is it relevant to the debate?
- Does it fit with other beliefs?
- Is there a sufficient range of evidence to support it?
- Can it be contradicted easily?
- Can it be achieved?
- Is it supported by sources of authority?
- Is there any evidence to support it?
- Is it probable, possible, or likely?
- Is it popular?
- How representative are its supporters?
- Has other evidence been ignored?
- Is it logical?
- Is the view being attacked misrepresented?
Evaluative Phrases
Sentence Starters
Use the following to signal to the examiner that you are meeting the expectations of Assessment Objective 2.
- “This is a strong argument because...”
- “This is a weak argument because…”
- “This claim can be effectively countered by…”
- “This claim can be countered, but rather poorly, by…”
- “This point stands up to scrutiny as…”
- “This point fails to stand up to scrutiny as…”
- “The underlying assumption behind this reason is a convincing one…”
- “The underlying assumption behind this reason is doubtful…”
- “The two assertions are equally balanced…”
- “It is difficult to choose between the evidence here…”
Useful Conjunctions
Addition
- Again; also; and; another; as well as; furthermore; in addition; moreover; too; what is more.
Cause & Effect
- As a consequence; as a result; as long as; because; consequently; depending upon; inevitably; since; therefore; whenever.
Comparison
- By the same token; comparatively; congruently; correspondingly; equally; equivalently; in the same way; just as; likewise; similarly.
Concession
- Admittedly; despite this; in any case; in spite of; nevertheless; notwithstanding; on the other hand; regardless; still; while it is true that.
Contrast
- Alternatively; although; despite this; however; in contrast; on the contrary; on the other hand; otherwise; whereas; yet.
Emphasis
- Above all; especially; in fact; in particular; indeed; more important(ly); notably; significantly; specifically; undoubtedly.
Illustration
- Essentially; for example; for instance; in actual fact; it became clear that; such as; this means that; this shows that; thus; to illustrate.
Summary & Conclusion
- After all; finally; in conclusion; in short; in the end; on the whole; overall; throughout; to summarise; ultimately.
Punctuation
Colon
- Appearance: ":"
- Use: a colon is used to list, join two clauses when the second cannot stand alone, and before a quotation or direct speech.
- Examples:
- You will need: a calculator, ruler and pen.
- I knew what to do: admit I had no book.
- Sir said: “Mark is a very able statistician.”
Semi-Colon
- Appearance: ";"
- Use: a semi-colon is used in between two equal clauses, which are closely related but could stand alone.
- Examples:
- Lizzie went to town; I stayed at home.
- Terry hates spiders; he finds them creepy.
- I love dogs; however, I dislike their smell.
Key Terms
- Go to: Eduqas A Level Religious Studies Guidance for Teaching.
- Key terms for Component 1 - the Study of Religion (Option D: Buddhism): see pp.80-87.
- Key terms for Component 2 - the Philosophy of Religion: see pp.132-141.
- Key terms for Component 3 - Religion and Ethics: see pp.158-167.